Virginia Freedom Riders :: Freedom Forums

nyfreedomriders

www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20080706/motoring/motorcycle-helmets-
get-star-ratings

Sunday, 6th July 2008
Motorcycle helmets get star ratings

The UK Department of Transport is providing star ratings for motorcycle
helmets in a bid to improve safety and offer buyers an idea of their
protective qualities.

Most UK bikers don't really know how motorcycle helmets are designed,
manufactured and tested. Once there were BSI standards, now there are
the UN ECE 22.05 tests, but many riders still make a judgment by asking
other bikers for recommendations, or assess the overall construction,
comfort and fit, when trying 'lids' on in a shop.

But all that is changing as the UK government-backed SHARP (Safety
Helmet Assessment Ratings Programme) comes onstream this year, offering
ratings from one to five stars for most popular biking helmets. The idea
is to give consumers an idea of the potential protective qualities a
helmet might have, with one star at the lower end, and five stars being
the top rating.

The initial DoT SHARP results are surprising, as some helmets from top
brands like Arai, Shoei and AGV only made three stars, while budget
brands like Nitro or Lazer were rated five out of five in the SHARP
tests. It all begs the question: What testing methods are they using
exactly, and is a cheap helmet as good as an expensive one?

SHARP tests are designed to log the effects of a specific impact of
between 6.5 and 8.5 metres per second on specially selected points of
the helmet's outer shell - both head-on, and a simulated glancing blow.
The impact speed is slightly higher than the existing ECE 22.05
regulations, but SHARP don't do any testing on the chinbar section of
the lid, or do a repeated impact on one area - like Arai do in their own
factory tests, for example.

Ferry Brouwer, who spent 27 years with Arai Europe, said: "The SHARP
ratings are supposed to save 50 lives per year, a good aim, which we
agree with, of course. But the new tests do not go far enough. SHARP do
not look at the methods of construction, a manufacturer's track record
in racing accidents, say, nor do they use repeated or random impacts.

"In the US, the Snell Foundation do random impact point testing for
example, and by not telling manufacturers which points will be tested,
it prevents makers from strengthening particular areas on the helmet
shell. Arai also believe that a penetration test of the shell is
crucial, as no two motorcycle accidents are the same and such incidents
can happen, sadly."

Watching the Arai testing rig drop helmets onto solid posts, suffer the
penetration test, and learning how important it is to keep the helmet's
inner EPS layer free from severe temperature changes, human sweat, dirt
from gloves, or damage from placing your bike keys inside your lid, was
an education.

Did you know that the inner polystyrene lining degrades in its
protective qualities by around three to five per year, and sweat may
accelerate that decline in the EPS layer's impact dissipation? So the
less your head sweats in hot weather, the longer that inner lining will
keep doing its job. Fact is, in the real world, the performance of the
helmet's air vents in hot weather matters - your head needs to stay
cool.

There are plenty of aspects of motorcycle helmet design and manufacture
which are still not tested by SHARP, and all bikers would surely benefit
from the most rigorous, in-depth and random, lab-based testing regime
that can be done at a reasonable cost by the authorities.

www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20080706/motoring/motorcycle-helmets-
get-star-ratings
_________________
New York Freedom Riders - R.A.C.E.
Riders Against Constitutional Erosion
Freedom Is NOT A Spectator Sport - Your Participation Is Required
Join the R.A.C.E. for Freedom

New York Freedom Riders